This site is intended for healthcare professionals

Pages

The Pages section of GPnotebook comprises more than 30,000 concise, interlinked clinical reference articles, each focused on a specific primary care topic.



This month's highlights

Dr Lisa Devine

A recently updated page on GPnotebook put me in great form and secured my financial contributions to my local coffee shop for the foreseeable future. The updated page looks at various studies on the association between coffee and mortality.

The studies reviewed include a slightly older paper that still offers important evidence. The authors performed a cohort study with a sample of participants in the National Institutes of Health–American Association of Retired Persons Diet and Health Study. A cohort study, as we know, is an observational study that follows a group of people and looks at certain outcomes, very often ones relating to their health.

The study involved more than 400,000 participants of retirement age who were followed for a median of 13.6 years. Notably, 52,000 people in the group passed away over the study period.

The cohort’s coffee consumption was assessed once at baseline. Information gained on coffee intake put participants into 10 possible categories, ranging from zero to six or more cups per day. There was an additional baseline question about the type of coffee (caffeinated versus decaffeinated).

Interestingly, and to my personal delight, I was reminded by reading this page of a key finding from the study: an inverse dose–response relationship between coffee consumption and mortality.

Among men, those who drank between two and three cups per day had a 10% decreased risk of mortality. Those men who drank between four and five cups per day had a 12% decreased risk of mortality and those who drank six or more cups per day had, again, a 10% decreased risk of mortality compared with non-coffee drinkers.

Among women, those who drank between two and three cups per day had a 13% decreased risk mortality, those who drank between four and five cups per day had a 16% reduced risk, and those who drank six or more cups of coffee per day had a 15% decreased risk of mortality compared with non-coffee drinkers.

The authors adjusted results for various confounding factors that could affect their validity – including age, BMI, race, level of education, lifestyle factors (e.g. current and prior smoking) and comorbidities.

Coffee consumption was associated with reduced mortality across several disease categories (including heart disease, stroke, injuries and accidents, and diabetes).

However, the authors of this study did caution that this was only an observational study, with further research needed into the area for more conclusive information on the subject. They also specifically pointed out that people with a prior cardiovascular event were excluded from their study.

The GPnotebook page in question also summarises other data relating to coffee, including from some more recent papers. The evidence examined includes a further study supporting the inverse relationship between coffee intake and mortality, one that looks at cardiometabolic conditions, mortality and coffee intake, and one that links drinking more than four cups of coffee per day with increased stroke risk. It really is worth a look.

Additionally of interest are a page on coffee intake and risk of hypertension and one on prostate cancer risk. And not to leave out the tea drinkers, this page looks at long-term tea drinking and mortality.

For me, reading the updated page provided great food for thought and made me feel less guilty about my own frequent coffee intake. I can’t say, though, that I will be actively promoting sky-high coffee intake for my patients in everyday practice without more conclusive evidence emerging. But it is useful to have this information to hand if people ask specific questions about coffee intake and mortality as this has been in the media in some countries lately.

I hope you enjoyed this latest email, and I look forward to writing for you again next month.

Trusted by thousands of GPs for more than 20 years

  • Reliable

    Since 2001, GPnotebook has been a "go-to" clinical reference source for busy primary care professionals seeking quick answers to clinical queries

  • Extensive

    Written by practising GPs, GPnotebook comprises more than 30,000 pages of clinical reference material, with each article focused on a specific primary care topic

  • Quick

    Information is organised into short, easy-to-read articles – quick enough to use during consultations. Hundreds of updates every month

  • Supports learning and development

    As well as the written reference material, we have a growing library of video and podcast content, along with educational modules and quizzes to support learning and personal development

The content herein is provided for informational purposes and does not replace the need to apply professional clinical judgement when diagnosing or treating any medical condition. A licensed medical practitioner should be consulted for diagnosis and treatment of any and all medical conditions.

Connect

Copyright 2025 Oxbridge Solutions Limited, a subsidiary of OmniaMed Communications Limited. All rights reserved. Any distribution or duplication of the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. Oxbridge Solutions receives funding from advertising but maintains editorial independence.